Evaluation Center Tools

Ruiwei Consulting found that in the process of designing and implementing the evaluation center, it is necessary to have very professional and systematic knowledge, such as how to design the evaluation matrix, how to organize the evaluation, etc.; this article mainly wants to share with you, The advantages of different evaluation tools and matters needing attention to help our customers better succeed in the evaluation center project.

In the final analysis, the evaluation center is a "combination of tools". Based on different purposes, costs, cycles and other considerations, we should make different choices. This article mainly shares with you several tools we often use:

No Leading Group Discussion
The subjects are divided into a group of 4-8 people. The members of the group have equal status. They are required to discuss some controversial issues (such as business development, bonus distribution, cadre promotion, etc.) that may occur in practical work, and finally form a written form. Report the consensus, each member must sign to express his opinion.

no leading group discussion:
Combined with the actual working situation, it is easy for the subjects to accept and enter the role faster.
-Discussions are prone to real inducing effects and reduce behavioral camouflage.
-Giving subjects equal opportunities to play and quickly showing individual differences
Can observe the interaction between subjects as team members

What we should pay attention to in the discussion of the leading group:
In-depth understanding of the daily work content of the post, so that the discussion topics are more in line with the actual situation of the subjects.
The topic of discussion can fully trigger the interaction between the subjects and make the differences appear.
The design of the discussion topic closely focuses on the ability and quality that the customer needs to examine (the reaction caused by the examination questions without a leading group must be in line with the evaluation objectives
(off), weakening the quality of non-inspection ability.
The ability and quality tested by no leading group should be explicit and easy to be observed.
-Designing behavioral performance corresponding to competency and quality, drawing up weights and scoring criteria

document basket test
Assume that the subject is in a management position, and his desk is piled with a series of reports, letters and memos waiting to be processed. They are typical problems from superiors and subordinates, inside and outside the organization, and the subject is required to be processed within 2-3 hours. After that, the subject fills in the reason for this treatment, and the subject can communicate with the subject again in the question.

Document Basket Test:
· The operation is simple, mainly involving the subject's operation on the "thing", and does not involve the complex interaction between people, so the operation is simple
Easy
Combined with the actual working situation, it is easy for the subjects to accept and enter the role faster.
Strong comprehensiveness, the test topic involves finance, team management, business management and other contents.

document basket test:
Take the customer's daily internal management documents (mail, reports, etc.) as the original data of the document basket, adjust and redesign to ensure the work.
Authenticity of scene simulation
Focus on the ability and quality that customers need to examine, and combine the 2/8 principle to select the key work links of 20% that have a greater impact on performance.
As a test scenario
· Implement "comprehensive simulation" to integrate various simulations to form a common and complete working scenario, thereby reducing the role of the subject
Change, enhance the continuity of the test

case analysis
The target work of the subject, especially a higher-level post than the subject at present, a certain management event that has occurred in the post is compiled into a case, so that the subject can analyze and judge, and put forward the countermeasures to deal with it in writing or orally. This measures the corresponding ability and quality of the subject.

case analysis:
· Trigger in-depth thinking, easy to discover the subject's problem-solving thinking and methods, and examine the combination of the subject's theoretical knowledge and practical work
Tightness
-Case studies focus on outcomes rather than processes and are more focused
Combined with the actual working situation, it is easy for the subjects to accept and enter the role faster.
case analysis:
· The case is taken from the challenging problems encountered in the daily work of the subject
· Set a reasonable amount of information and control the difficulty of the case, so that the case can not only lead to in-depth thinking, but also maintain operability and implementability
For more information, please contact Rui Wei consultant:info@right-way.cn